BC’s Poisoned Drug Crisis: What YOU Need to Know

picture of woman pointing to a sign of what you need to know
What YOU Need to Know
The Grim Reality

The poisoned drug crisis has reached epidemic proportions that claim lives daily. In Canada alone, an average of 22 people die each day from toxic street drugs. In BC, 2023 delivered more than 7 deaths a day. This year, In January another 198 deaths were recorded in BC. These deaths are PREVENTABLE, yet they persist due to a complex web of factors. Why isn’t the crisis getting better? What are we doing wrong? Let’s delve into the heart of this crisis.

Key Statistics and Trends

·       Opioid Toxicity:– a term used to classify substance use deaths involving opioids. With each passing day, the crisis worsens, as street drugs become increasingly more lethal and effective Government action remains elusive.

·       Unregulated Substances: Unlike contaminated food products or contaminated prescription or regulated drugs that trigger swift regulatory responses, our unregulated drug supply remains a deadly menace.

Fentanyl, benzodiazepines, and a host of other substances are mixed with, cocaine, methamphetamine, and other drugs without any regard to warning to people who use these substances.


Traditional Methods – Complete Failure?

Why would we use a term so provocative like “complete failure?” Folks, in all seriousness, if we didn’t have the flawed and generally limping-along system we do, the overdose deaths in our province would be beyond imaginable. However, those same flawed systems and policies are not decreasing deaths.

How does that saying go? – Doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result …– We’ve long passed the line between the positive characteristics of perseverance versus continuing to waste lives on dysfunctional policies and procedures. It’s time to highlight the futility of repeating actions without adapting or seeking alternative approaches. In other words, it’s time to stop continuing down the same path. All we’re seeing is more deaths from the same old, same old. If there ever was a time to embrace change and innovation rather than remain stuck in an unproductive status quo, it is now.

Traditional approaches to addressing the poisoned drug crisis have proven ridiculously ineffective. They continue to perpetuating the cycle of harm and loss. Let’s take a look at why some of the major methods fall short and fail us all:

1.   **Criminalization and Punitive Measures:

·    Issue: Decades and decades of treating drug use as a criminal offence rather than a health issue. Look around – has punishment improved any of the drug crisis? Do we really think harsher punishment is the answer? Look south to the USA. Harsher punishment for people using substances is a completely failed strategy.

·    Failure: Criminalization stigmatizes users, hindering their access to support and treatment. It does not address the root causes of addiction.

·    Impact: Overcrowded prisons, strained legal systems, huge cost to taxpayers with no return and continued substance misuse.

2.   **Abstinence-Only Programs:

·        Issue: Relying solely on abstinence-based approaches before recovery can begin.

·      Failure: Many users struggle with addiction despite their desire to quit. Abstinence-only programs fail to acknowledge the latest evidence-based research that relapse is part of the recovery process.

·      Impact: High relapse rates and limited support for those who cannot achieve complete abstinence. People thrown out of abstinence-based recovery programs learn one thing – their lives don’t matter.

3.   **Lack of Harm Reduction:

·        Issue: Neglecting harm reduction principles.

·      Failure: Many jurisdictions are advocating focusing solely on prevention without providing tools for safer use. This perpetuates risk and kills more people.

·     Impact: Increased overdose deaths, infections, and societal costs to everyone. Studies conservatively state that for every dollar spent on harm reduction, $1.30 is saved in the health system.

4.   **Stigma and Discrimination:

·        Issue: Viewing substance users as morally flawed.

·       Failure: Stigma prevents open dialogue, discourages people from seeking help, and perpetuates isolation.

·        Impact: Lives lost due to delayed intervention and lack of empathy.

5.   **Inadequate Access to Treatment:

·        Issue: Limited availability of addiction treatment centres.

·       Failure: Our waiting lists in BC typically run weeks or even months. Waiting lists, lack of resources, and geographical barriers hinder timely access.

·        Impact: Preventable deaths and many, many missed opportunities for recovery.

6.   **Ignoring Socioeconomic Factors:

·         Issue: Disregarding the impact of poverty, trauma, and social determinants.

·         Failure: Substance use often arises from complex life circumstances.

·         Impact: Failure to address underlying issues perpetuates the crisis.

7.   **Resistance to Evidence-Based Approaches:

·        Issue: Ignoring science, research and evidence.

·       Failure: Evidence-based harm reduction strategies (e.g., safe supply, and supervised consumption sites) are underutilized.

·        Impact: Huge missed opportunities to save lives and reduce harm.

Clinging to traditional methods without adapting to the evolving crisis has been a colossal failure. Even in the traditional models we use, we’re nickel and diming solutions. We add a few dollars here and there to programs or change one or two minor policies that have minimal impact. Provincially in 2024, the Government did not increase spending for the poisoned drug crisis one penny.

Let’s look at some of our existing addiction supports. For example, BC has approximately 3600 publicly funded recovery beds. The Government's own numbers suggest that we have approximately between 125,000 to 225,000 people with a drug addiction disorder. Using the lower number, that means it would take 8.6 years to put everyone through a 90-day recovery program once (100% occupancy rate). We know most people relapse several times. That means best case possible, it will take 20 to 24 years for just the existing people to reach recovery.

If we are going to solve this catastrophe, we must embrace innovative, compassionate, and evidence-driven solutions to combat the poisoned drug crisis effectively.
 

Deeper Dive Into Causes and Contributing Factors

1. Social and Economic Pressures

·         Poverty: When life gets unbearable, people become desperate for even a few moments of relief from their suffering. Desperation drives them toward the edge. Imagine being homeless, feeling trapped in a situation with no way out. Every minute of every day is filled with choosing between hunger, cold, danger and no access to simple basic needs like bathrooms.

·         Stigma and Isolation: Society’s judgment isolates drug users. They hide in the shadows, fearing rejection. But compassion can be a lifeline.

2. Cultural Attitudes and Policies

·         Criminalization: Punitive drug policies don’t work. Criminalizing users doesn’t solve the problem; it worsens it. We know it’s frustrating. We’ve heard people wanting simple solutions, like “Why can we put them all in jail?” Remember what we stated earlier on how many recovery beds we need? Prisons cost at least twice as much as health alternatives and there is no attempt to heal people’s root problems in prisons. That means people finishing their sentences come right back to their communities with zero recovery rates. For that reason alone, we should be rethinking criminalization. We need a fresh perspective.

·         Taboos and Misconceptions: Let’s break free from stereotypes. Substance use isn’t a one-size-fits-all issue. It’s complex, and we must approach it with well-thought-out solutions and empathy.

Impact on Communities

1. Public Health Strain

·         Overwhelmed Healthcare Systems: Emergency rooms struggle with overdose cases. Doctors and nurses fight to save lives, but the system is stretched thin. In BC, there is only one small trial in St Paul’s Hospital that provides direct access to recovery via an ER

·         Blood-Borne Infections: Shared needles spread HIV and Hepatitis C. These infections ripple through communities, affecting us all.

2. Societal Perceptions

·         Shifting Paradigms: Harm reduction challenges old norms. It’s time to see addiction as a health issue, not a moral failing. Imagine a world where we offer help instead of judgment.

·         Community Resilience: Grassroots efforts matter. Organizations like Moms Stop The Harm mourn lost loved ones and advocate for change. They’re our heroes. If you really want answers to this crisis, ask a mom or family member who has lost someone what they think would work.

Solutions and Harm Reduction

1. Harm Reduction Strategies

·         Harm Reduction: The one bright spot in the crisis is the effectiveness of harm reduction. Naloxone alone has saved countless lives in the Province. In addition, harm reduction initiatives have saved taxpayers huge costs that would have been paid in other health and government programs – eg treating HIV or Hepatitis C

·         Supervised Injection Sites: Picture a safe haven where medical professionals oversee substance use. It’s like having a safety net while walking a tightrope. These sites prevent overdoses and connect users to additional support including access to recovery programs.

·         Needle Exchange Programs: Sterile needles save lives. Harm reduction isn’t about scolding; it’s about compassion. Harm reduction is not enablement. Harm reduction prioritizes life and safety over judgment.

2. Safe Supply Initiatives

·         Regulated Drugs: Let’s rethink our approach. A safe and regulated drug supply can prevent poisonings and deaths. It’s time to prioritize lives over stigma. Most of the rhetoric against regulated supply is based on fear and opinion from outdated beliefs – not science-based evidence and research.

Future Outlook and Call to Action

1. Collective Responsibility

·         Education: Learn about all the aspects of the crisis and harm reduction. Share knowledge with friends and family. Imagine a world where everyone understands the basics of saving lives.

·         Advocate: Demand policy changes. Support organizations fighting for safer drug use. Imagine a world where our voices create change.

2. Think Beyond Tradition

·         Innovate: The same-old methods don’t serve us anymore. Imagine a world where we think outside the box, using innovative solutions. Let’s explore new paths.

·         Compassion: Every life matters. Imagine a world where compassion guides our actions. Let’s rewrite the narrative together.

The poisoned drug crisis isn’t someone else’s problem; it’s ours. Lives depend on our choices. Let’s choose compassion, science, and action. Imagine a world where we save lives, one step at a time. 

Comments

  1. You mention in your article that punishment does not work... you further point to the USA as an example..... YET... you failed to look further afield... to Singapore to be precise... where they don't have a drug problem.. where they don't have drug gangs or street executions.... because they have mandatory sentencing... that includes the death penalty for some crimes.... Singapore does not tolerate A-holes destroying their people... or destroying their communities... or destroying their country... It seems to work extremely well for Singaporeans... few people put to death... some years no one.... safe and clean streets... great housing... great healthcare system... It seems like they have the right formula for a basically drug free country...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Ace

      Let’s delve into the differences between Singapore and Canada, especially regarding criminalization and health models.

      Criminalization Approach:
      Singapore: Known for its strict approach, Singapore employs mandatory sentencing, including the death penalty for certain crimes. This tough stance aims to deter criminal behavior and maintain order.
      Canada: In contrast, Canada emphasizes rehabilitation and restorative justice. The focus is on addressing the root causes of crime and reintegrating offenders into society.

      Drug Policies:
      Singapore: The country has indeed managed to keep drug-related issues in check. However, it’s essential to recognize that Singapore’s context is unique. Its small size, strong governance, and cultural factors contribute to its success.
      Canada: Canada takes a harm reduction approach. While it faces drug-related challenges, it prioritizes public health over punitive measures. Harm reduction programs aim to minimize harm to individuals and communities.
      Execution and Safety:

      Singapore: Although Singapore occasionally imposes the death penalty, it’s essential to note that few people are executed, and some years witness no executions at all. The result is relatively safe streets.
      Canada: Canada abolished the death penalty in 1976. While safety varies across cities, the focus is on community policing, social services, and harm reduction rather than capital punishment.

      Healthcare Models:
      Singapore: The country boasts an efficient healthcare system, emphasizing preventive care and early intervention. It combines public and private sectors, ensuring accessible and high-quality services.
      Canada: Canada’s healthcare system is publicly funded, providing universal coverage. While it faces challenges like wait times, it prioritizes equitable access to healthcare for all citizens.

      Quality of Life:
      Singapore: Singaporeans enjoy longevity, with an average life expectancy of 86 years. The city-state’s cleanliness, housing, and healthcare contribute to a high quality of life.

      Canada: Canadians have an average life expectancy of 84 years. Canada’s vastness, natural beauty, and multiculturalism enrich its quality of life.

      Wrapping up: What is often lost by some people bent on implementing Singapore's Capital Punishment model to Canada is that Singapore also has one of the best detox/recovery models in the world. People can access these resources almost immediately, where is Canada and BC access is sadly, seriously lacking. Both countries have distinct approaches, shaped by their unique contexts. While Singapore’s strict policies work well for its specific circumstances, Canada focuses on a more holistic approach to justice and health. We do not endorse punitive models. In they end, they cause serious harm and cost by far more than health based models to the community and tax payers. What we do endorse is a robust system of harm reduction and access to detox and recovery.

      Delete
    2. Thanks anonymous
      Your first statement is inaccurate... Singapore DOES focus on rehabilitation. If you come before the court because of something you have done under the influence... you will be offered treatment OR jail... Here in Canada... especially B.C. the drug policies have failed miserably... despite rehab... free 'safe' drugs... safe injection sites...

      Your 2nd statement just repeats how Canada takes a harm reduction approach... let me remind you... B.C. over 2.500 overdose deaths in 2023... Singapore none... WHAT!!!!!

      Healthcare... Once again you present Canada as THE model... while 1000s die every year waiting for life sustaining surgeries and treatments.. and it is equitable to none... MPs.. Military... Sports Figures.. Federal Prisoners.. here in B.C... workers... ALL have priority over the general citizen..

      Quality of Life... I can agree with you... Here in B.C. the province is spectacular

      Your wrap up leave me a little confused... Singapore focuses on a mandatory sentencing program... including the death penalty for certain crimes... some drug crimes... murders to name a couple... so if you decide to get involved in the illicit drug trade you already know the consequence of your choice. Singapore puts very few people to death for any cause... Singapore lose very few people to drug overdoses... You state that Singapore has one of the BEST detox/recovery models in the world.. which is part of a package... then your last statement "What we (Canada) do endorse is a robust system of harm reduction and access" to detox and recovery." Anonymous what Canada has done has failed... it costs lives... 1000s... it destroys communities... it overburdens the healthcare system to the point that people cannot get life sustaining surgeries or treatments... costing 1000s of lives... Here in B.C. under EBY and his government 911 calls for drug overdoses rose 25% to over 42,000 calls in 2023... coincidently the year that EBY legalised the possession of ALL drugs... and it costs billions...

      If anything your comments would say... adopt the Singaporean way as quickly as possible... and let's take back our communities.. our cities.. our province and our country

      Delete
    3. Hi ACE - Nope, we don't endorse the Singapore model. As much as the Singapore might entice people, it has huge flaws, not the least of which is capital punishment. Let's be real here. Canada will never go back to Capital Punishment, so suggesting that as alternative, isn't helpful. We also stated in our first post that the actual cost to tax payers is much higher for a criminalization model than a health care model. There is lots of science-based research to back this up.

      Also, Singapore is a city - it's not a Province or State. because of it's small geographic area, Singapore has significant benefits over a Province like BC - for example, they can easily monitor their borders.

      The bigger differences in Singapore that really impact their lower addiction rates is their poverty and homelessness programs. For example, in the entire city, they have less than 1000 homeless people. With a population of half the size of Singapore, Greater Vancouver has four times that amount.

      Singapore does a significantly better job on their health and social determinant programs than BC or Canada. That's what we attribute most of their success in combating their poisoned drug crisis - not to their punitive programs. Even Singapore would tell you they use those tools last. (by the way, over the last 2 years, Singapore overdose deaths have doubled - still low rates compared to other jurisdictions, but none the less, shows they have their own challenges'. -Apparently Meth is on a serious rise in Singapore, - probably because it can be made locally)

      So, yes we are envious of Singapore's social support programs - If only BC and Canada would invest at a similar level. Here are some details of Singapore resources -

      Singapore's approach to addressing homelessness involves a combination of policies and initiatives that have contributed to its low homeless population. Some key policies and strategies include:
      Comprehensive Support Services: Singapore provides various support services for the homeless, including shelters, assisted living units, and community resources like the ComCare hotline (1800-222-0000) and email (msf_peersoffice@msf.gov.sg) for those in need of assistance
      .
      Whole-of-Society Approach: There is a shift towards a whole-of-society approach in tackling homelessness in Singapore. This approach emphasizes social inclusion and support beyond just providing housing, recognizing that exiting homelessness is a lifelong journey that requires community involvement

      .
      Research and Data-Driven Policies: The National University of Singapore's Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy conducted the first nationwide study on homelessness in Singapore, providing valuable insights into the demographics, reasons for homelessness, and challenges faced by the homeless population. This research informs policy decisions and resource allocation

      .
      Specialized Funds: Initiatives like the Digital Connectivity Fund, Special Support Fund, Home Transition Fund, and Research Fund have been established to provide specific assistance to homeless individuals and understand the nature of homelessness in Singapore

      .
      Community Engagement: Organizations like Homeless Hearts of Singapore and Catholic Welfare Services engage volunteers to help reintegrate homeless individuals back into the community through outreach programs and advocacy efforts

      .
      These policies reflect a multi-dimensional approach that addresses not only the immediate housing needs of the homeless but also focuses on long-term solutions, community involvement, and research-driven strategies to combat homelessness effectively in Singapore.

      Delete
    4. Singapore has chosen the death penalty as a MANDATORY sentence.. anyone choosing to break their laws already know the consequences if caught.. Here in Canada when a huge drug bust is made... those caught are typically back on the street in a few days at most.. and may not appear before a court for several years.. and their defence will exploit any way they can... as for Canada never going back to Capital Punishment... I wonder what you base that on... AND I was not even suggesting the death penalty... What I am suggesting is if Canada really wants to address the drug problems they would make the punishment insidious... and MANDATORY... I would add that I am not talking about the street level dealer with small amounts.. but those that are manufacturing fentanyl... responsible for 86% of overdose deaths... those that are importing and distributing large amounts of class A drugs... Here is a quote from Singapore Anti-Narcotics Association
      "Traffickers. The reason we take a tough position is in the first place, we don't want people to get into this. We are dealing with downstream problems, but upstream, lives are being destroyed, families being affected, and the thousands of people who will get into drug abuse if we were not strict. Our task would become impossible. But, it's not just that our task becomes impossible. Their lives are ruined, their families’ lives are ruined, and you will see many more deaths." Please note that it is stated that if they were not so strict their task would become impossible...

      Here is another quote
      "when drugs are freely available in society, regardless of the way in which they become available – whether it is because of soft drug laws, poor enforcement or regulation, or capture of the government by big pharma – the result is that there are more deaths, more families are destroyed, and society suffers tremendously. And often, who suffers the most? The lower socio-economic groups, they are the ones who suffer the most out of all of this." A very true statement none more so than here in B.C. where drugs and the governments chosen path is destroying our province

      This one is regarding drug abusers
      "drug abusers, our approach is very clear. We treat them as patients, we treat them as individuals. We want them to recover, and we give them every support to recover through Yellow Ribbon, through SANA, through others." The one thing they do not do is give them is free 'safe' drugs... and they won't tolerate drug abuses shooting up anywhere with impunity.... like children's playgrounds

      This last one sums it up quite well... "While the global situation is challenging and will not get easier, in Singapore, our streets are safe, our families are protected, and as I often say to my audiences, you can send your 10-year-old child on public transport and not worry whether the child will come back."

      Singapore seems to have a good handle on illicit drugs in their country... while Canada and particularly B.C., illicit drugs are out of control... communities are destroyed... businesses are destroyed.. overdose deaths at all time highs... 911 over run... with a 25% increase in overdose calls in 2023... over 42,000 calls... the year that possession of all drugs became legal... homeless up.. stranger attacks a daily occurence.. WHEN DOES THIS B.C. GOVERNMENT SAY THAT WHAT THEY ARE DOING IS NOT ONLY HELPING BUT ARE DESTROYING BRITISH COLUMBIA...

      As for your reference to Portugal... they are now reviewing their policies as they are seeing drug related problems on the rise... and Oregon.. which B.C. model their programs on... is in crisis and looks to recriminalise drug possession

      Delete
    5. We agree with you - we have no sympathy for organizations or individuals who supply drugs, especially at the distribution level. In our recent Blueprint document, we recommended significantly increasing criminal penalties in the Canadian Criminal Justice system. You can access our recommendations here: https://ptalbcat.blogspot.com/2024/02/blueprint.html - Look in section 4.11.

      Portugal is reviewing it's policies - not because they are moving away from them, but because they've acknowledged inconsistences in applying them since 2000. Portugal has found that over the last 2 decades, there has been Oscillating between public order and public health internally within the government and society as a whole. This is to be expected when a major shift is made in the way something like sun stance use is approached. Portugal has found in the last 8 years or so that there has been a upswing in prison terms for people who use drugs. They are questioning this upswing. Overall, Portugal is looking to apply consistency through out their PDPM.

      The problem in Canada and BC, like all things Canadian, we always do things half-assed. If we're going to fix this, we have to accept ALL of the social determinate model for substance disorder. This means addressing poverty, like Singapore and Portugal, Homelessness, like Singapore and Portugal, recovery and detox immediate access, like Singapore and Portugal, programs to help people with life skills, like Singapore and Portugal - and yes, criminal justice solutions that address suppliers, like Singapore and Portugal.

      Here's a good example of how it differs for Singapore/Portugal versus us in BC - in both Singapore and Portugal, if you want detox or recovery, you can access it post haste. In BC you're going to get a referral slip for weeks or months in the future.

      Harm reduction by itself nor decriminalization for personal use of substances by themselves itself are not the solutions to the crisis in BC. Neither is a regulated safe supply, although until the next sentence happens, they help prevent deaths - What we need to put in place is a holistic comprehensive program program that addresses the social determinates and health system deficiencies. That is the solution.

      Portugal versus Singapore have very similar stats by the way - Portugal without the draconian methodologies.

      Delete
    6. Glad to see that you are recognising Singapore has a system that works in all respects.... I took the time to read the link to your thoughts about the need to have the government take a look at the present system.... BUT you make no suggestion on how or what to do... As you must know that this BC government and the feds will not do anything until the citizens demand it... and get a party to agree to it...

      Most of what you wrote I can agree with you... except your last statement stating that Singapore has draconian methodologies... Singapore has the perfect answer.. as far as perfect goes... and should they be draconian... Canada should be rushing to adopt them.... Oh just in case you don't know... Singapore is a democracy based on similar values as Canada... Elections are held every 5 years... and the SAME party has been re-elected since their independence in 1965... a remarkable feat by any stretch of the imagination....

      Im 2016 a public health emergency was declared because of the number of overdose deaths from FENTANYL.... it is now 2024 AND FENTANYL is responsible for 86% of all overdose deaths... add to that Canada has now become a major manufacturer of illicit fentanyl... producing enough fentanyl they have become exporters... Anyone with any CommonSense would think... damn we really need to stop fentanyl... or seriously interrupt the supply...

      Delete
    7. I agree with Ace....no drugs....no problem. In BC ....the current government is condoning the "problem" they are almost encouraging drug use. Rachael Blaney stood up in in parliament and said that we should "reduce the sigma" . Really?? We need new government.

      Delete
    8. Hi there,

      Hi Anonymous - We understand the frustration expressed in your comment. The toxic drug crisis in BC is a complex and heartbreaking issue, and it's natural to look for solutions. However, the statement "no drugs, no problem" is an oversimplification that doesn't reflect the realities of addiction and the complexities of this crisis.

      Here are some key points to consider:

      Addiction is a disease, not a choice: People with substance use disorders often struggle with complex underlying factors, including mental health issues, trauma, and poverty. Simply saying "no" doesn't address these root causes.
      The current drug supply is poisoned: The issue isn't solely about drug use itself, but the contamination of the illegal drug supply with powerful synthetic opioids like fentanyl. This makes even small amounts of drugs potentially lethal, regardless of someone's tolerance or experience.

      Stigma is a barrier to help: Blaming and shaming individuals struggling with addiction only pushes them further away from seeking help. Reducing stigma is crucial for encouraging people to access harm reduction resources and treatment programs.

      While we can't comment on specific political figures or parties, we encourage everyone to approach this issue with compassion and a willingness to understand the underlying complexities.

      Here are some additional points to consider:

      Harm reduction strategies like safe supply programs, overdose prevention training, and naloxone distribution have been shown through science/evidenced-based research to save lives and connect people with treatment pathways.

      Supporting increased access to mental health and addiction treatment is critical for addressing the root causes of problematic substance use.
      Investing in community-based solutions tailored to specific needs can promote long-term recovery and address the social determinants of health that contribute to addiction.

      The toxic drug crisis requires a multi-faceted approach that recognizes the human suffering at its core. While there are no easy answers, understanding the complexities and focusing on evidence-based solutions will be key to saving lives and building a healthier future for all of us.

      Delete
    9. While I am sure your motivations are honourable... You STILL do not recognise what is killing people and destroying British Columbia... or if you do, you choose to ignore it.... I will leave you with this... If a dike breaks and floods the town... any efforts made to mop up the flood water is pointless UNTIL the floodwater is stopped or seriously interrupted... AND that is what has happened with fentanyl... no government or political party has seriously addressed the flow of fentanyl... and consequently all the efforts and money... have failed miserably... killing 1000s.... anyone that bows down and states that it cannot be addressed becomes the problem
      Alan Clarke

      Delete
  2. Hi ACE - One final comment. We think you should look at comparable jurisdictions, like Portugal. Portugal has a population of 10 million people compared to 5 million in BC.

    In 2023, Portugal reported an average of around 80 fatal drug overdoses for the entire country compared to 2217 in BC. Ask yourself why?

    The lower number of fatal overdoses in Portugal compared to British Columbia can be attributed to Portugal's comprehensive approach to addressing drug addiction and overdose. Portugal's strategy focuses on healthcare, community support, and the decriminalization of personal drug use. This approach has led to a significant decrease in fatal overdoses in Portugal, making it a promising international model for tackling drug addiction and overdose crises.

    The emphasis on health care, addiction treatment, job training, housing support, and the absence of stigma or punishment in the process has contributed to Portugal's success in reducing fatal overdoses and improving outcomes for individuals struggling with addiction. They do this without draconian death penalties or caning, because they have embraced human, empathetic and COMPREHENSIVE social programs that support people with health challenges like substance disorders.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. We must agree to disagree on Singapore being the perfect answer. We think it is anything but. We're well aware of the drug crisis declaration in 2016. So far BC has lost more than 14,000 people.

      It appears you only read the article and did not download the recommendations document that we gave you the link to - our Blueprint document is more than 60 pages and includes very specific recommendations on all aspects of the crisis. Section 3 is a great primer for those who don't understand how we got to this mess. Section for includes more than a hundred recommendations on solutions - most of our recommendations centre around a timely comprehensive system that eludes BC and Canada at this time.

      Both Portugal and Singapore have these wrap around systems. We envy both, but much prefer the humanistic Portugal model over the Singapore version. That's not to say Singapore social programs don't work. We just don't want to live in a society that punishes people for a health problem. (dealers excepted) Other jurisdictions across the world that are best-in-class models, all concentrate on comprehensive wrap around systems that address not only recovery/detox, and harm reduction, but also the root cause of the crisis.

      Thank you for the dialogue - if we're going to make any progress it begins with talking about the challenges and working through the solutions for a better community for everyone.

      Delete
  3. Addressing Ace’s support of killing people through legally sanctioned policies I have this to say. First it is hard to hold back my disgust at the idea that capital punishment works to stop substance use. But that’s all I will say about that. I have gone through a number of documents and articles about Singapores barbaric justifications to take the lives of others.

    I was very recently in Indonesia which boasts the same approach using capital punishment as a justifiable way to “rid” the country of drugs. In short, the corruption in that country is extremely high. Those who have any kind of money buy their way out of charges through bribes to police and to judges. The rest of those who are being incarcerated are of course amongst the most impoverished in the country. Singapore has a very similar story to tell. This story includes a rising movement in tourism to other countries where drug laws are more “liberal “.

    Despite the death penalty in both countries, substance use is on the rise as is of course the overdose death rates. But then that’s okay there because they want them all dead anyway.

    Having spent my life as a treatment provider I can guarantee you that very very few people seldom go through even longer term programs just once or twice. And I can guarantee you that it takes more than a one size fits all approach. Singapore says it uses a zero tolerance abstinence only approach in treatment. That works for some, typically when it comes to alcohol. But it increases the risk of overdose deaths in this climate for a number of reason not the least of which are decreased tolerance after abstinence and a deadly cocktail of unregulated substances.

    Singapore says it uses a biopsychosocial approach in its treatment programs. Okay fair. A good robust approach with a success rate of about the same as any other approach when abstinence is the main objective: less than half of people who complete these programs report abstinence beyond a 6 month mark. And of course if data can be retrieved, even less over one year. This is universal across all types of treatment models and approaches that use abstinence only as the objective.

    As far as 0.7% of people reporting illicit drug use in the past year…duh! The fear of legal consequences, especially death penalties, significantly affect reporting of any kind of use. This is government propaganda.

    So my interest is peaked to dig a little deeper. But like with Indonesia and North America I will likely find many commonalities of why the war on drugs was ever started in the first place.

    What I do know from experience far beyond my academic learning is that my colleagues and I deal with real people, with real stories. Yes even the dealers who have stories most of us would not survive. Yet we are quick to condemn all of them with one swipe of the guillotine as it were. That’s what I call some dark crusades style bullshit…. Instigated by the US by the way back in the early 1900’s.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ben Goerner you need to clarify some of your points.... you state that Singapore's overdose death rate is on the rise.... please substantiate... you further indicated that Singapore is a corrupt country and people with money can buy their way out... please substantiate.... you further state that Singapore's strict drug laws are causing tourists are avoiding Singapore... please substantiate...

      You further go on to state that Singapore's zero tolerance abstinence cause more overdose deaths.. please substantiate.... as Singapore has very few overdose deaths.... you then go on and state that Singapore's approach to rehab has a high failing rate... please substantiate... And on you go... calling Singapore's illicit drug use numbers are government propaganda... please substantiate...

      Ben Goerner you made many claims trying to disparage Singapore and their drug policies... YET... Singapore has little in the way of a drug problem... or gangs... or street executions... there is little in the way of vandalism... stranger attacks... blatant violent robberies... their streets are clean AND safe... their parks are safe for all, especially children... their healthcare is excellent along with an excellent housing policy....

      Now here in British Columbia... where the possession of all drugs is legal.... where there are over 300 'safe' injection sites... where the government gives out free 'safe drugs... the overdose death rate is over 2,500... communities are destroyed... businesses are destroyed... street executions are rampant... stranger attacks are frequent...healthcare is in crisis... housing is in crisis.... homeless in crisis... families cannot afford to feed and house themselves...

      Ben Goerner it would appear that the method that you support has failed miserably... and the Singaporean system that is successful... you find disgusting...
      I look forward to your response...
      Alan Clarke

      Delete
    2. @Alan Clarke, thank you for sharing your concerns. (Sorry - one of your posts was accidentally lost somehow in the blogger system - This post covers our response form the PtAlbCAT ) The opioid crisis in British Columbia is a very complex and urgent issue, and we appreciate your engagement in this dialogue. Let’s explore a compassionate and evidence-based response, how ever by itself, it is a very one dimensional solution to the crisis. Should there be more enforcement of criminals on the up stream supply end? Absolutely! We advocate with govt on that as well as all the other solutions.

      Public Safety Matters:
      You’re right; public safety is important. We cannot ignore the devastating impact of fentanyl-related deaths on individuals, families, and communities. That includes law enforcement to stop major drug suppliers.

      Immediate Interventions: Like mopping up floodwater, we must address immediate harm. Measures such as naloxone distribution, supervised consumption sites, and harm reduction education are crucial. These interventions save lives and provide essential support.

      Multifaceted Approach:
      However, public safety alone won’t suffice. We need a comprehensive, multilateral strategy:

      Supply Reduction: Disrupting the flow of fentanyl is vital. Collaborating with international partners to tackle illicit production and trafficking is essential.
      Harm Reduction: Safe consumption sites, needle exchanges, and drug-checking services reduce harm. They connect people to health resources and encourage safer practices.

      Treatment and Recovery: Accessible treatment options, including medication-assisted treatment (MAT), counseling, and mental health support, are critical.
      Social Determinants: Addressing poverty, housing instability, and trauma contributes to long-term solutions.

      Stigma Reduction: Stigmatizing language perpetuates barriers to seeking help. Let’s promote empathy and understanding.

      Government Responsibility:
      Governments play a pivotal role. They must allocate resources, collaborate with experts, and prioritize evidence-based policies.

      Supervised Drug Supply: Exploring alternatives like safe supply programs can reduce reliance on the toxic street market.
      Decriminalization: Treating drug use as a health issue, not a criminal one, fosters trust and encourages people to seek help.

      Community Engagement:
      We need collective action. Community organizations, healthcare providers, and individuals all contribute.
      Listening to Lived Experience: People who use drugs must be part of the conversation. Their insights are invaluable.

      Hope and Healing:
      Every life lost is a tragedy. Let’s honor those we’ve lost by advocating for change.
      Remembering Lives: Memorial events and awareness campaigns humanize the crisis.

      Supporting Survivors: Compassion and empathy are powerful tools for healing.

      Lastly you mentioned Mr Goerner's comments versus your comments that were removed - the difference in that Mr Goerner's disgust was directed at the "idea that capital punishment works to stop substance use in Singapore" - not you personally. Your comments were a personal attack on Mr Goerner. You're free to express your perspective on policies, pls back-up by facts where possible, - you are not free to personally attack other people who post things you do not agree with. Normally we just delete comments and ban profiles that violate our posting policies. In you case, I've replied to you because when you were stay on topic and respect other posters perspectives, your input was valuable and worth reading.

      Delete
  4. Reminder of platform guidelines for readers who comment on posts. Obviously, if one or more of these are violated, you post will be moderated or removed. There is no appeal process. The moderator's decision is final.

    Respectful Communication:
    Engage in respectful and civil communication. Avoid personal attacks, insults, or offensive language.

    Stay on Topic:
    Keep comments relevant to the post's content. Straying too far from the topic may disrupt the conversation.

    No Hate Speech:
    Refrain from posting any content that promotes discrimination, hate speech, or prejudice based on factors such as race, ethnicity, gender, religion, or sexual orientation.

    Avoid Spamming:
    Do not spam the comment section with repetitive or irrelevant content. This includes excessive self-promotion, links, or unrelated information.

    Fact-Check Before Posting:
    Ensure that the information shared is accurate and supported by reliable sources. Misleading or false information can harm the quality of the discussion.

    Mindful of Tone and Language:
    Use a positive and inclusive tone. Be mindful of how language may be perceived by others, and avoid using offensive or inflammatory words.
    Constructive Criticism:

    If providing criticism, ensure it is constructive and focused on the content or ideas rather than attacking individuals. Encourage healthy debates.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Please note.... that Ben Goerner had not problem stating he found me disgusting for supporting Singapore's successful methods.... It would look like he broke rule no. 1... Respectful Communication... thanks for taking prompt unbiased action

      Delete
  5. I would like to thank the Pt Alb CAT for your continued efforts to educate people on trauma, substance use disorder and harm reduction. I invite people to take the time to educate themselves. The power of education is unmeasurable. Compassion is a lifeline really resonates with me. More people should take a compassionate approach and stop the judgement of something you have no knowledge about. I believe that in order to reduce the number of people dying from illicit drug poisonings in the long term is to focus on teaching compassion, resiliency, inclusion and understanding of trauma from an early age. Open informed honest communication that addresses the root causes of substance use is needed. Children need safe environments to grow; to know that they can recover from difficult situations and that turning to substance will not make us stronger. Compassion and gratitude are the "innovations" that communities need to explore.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment